Quantcast
Channel: Wills and Probate Archives - swarb.co.uk
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 4865

Perotti v Watson and others: CA 26 Feb 2004

$
0
0

References: [2004] EWCA Civ 269
Links: Bailii
Coram: Chadwick LJ
Ratio: The appellant seeking leave to appeal had previously asked for legal assistance. Mr Perottis had been involved in litigation against his father’s administrator over many years. A civil restraint order had been made against him. The first defendant had been appointed administrator de bonis non because the sums owed to him from the estate now exceeded the assets and as such the court’s discretion under section 116 had been used to appoint him. There was no realistic prospect of success of appealing against that order. Leave was refused on several other grounds of appeal.
Statutes: Supreme Courts Act 1961 116
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
This case cites:

  • See also – Perotti v Collyer-Bristow (A Firm) CA (Bailii, [2004] EWCA Civ 639, [2004] 4 All ER 53)
    The claimant had been dissatisfied with the way in which the defendant had administered the estate of his deceased uncle. The court had faced 14 applications by him.
    Held: ‘They are all totally devoid of merit. They were all made long after . .
  • See also – Perotti v Watson; Impanni; Abbate and Abbate CA (Bailii, [1996] EWCA Civ 623)
    The claimant sought permission to amend his claim to add an allegation of defamtion. Application refused. . .
  • See also – Watson, Rudolph, Hosp v Perotti, Abbate CA (Bailii, [1997] EWCA Civ 804)
    The defendant appealed an order for an inquiry as to the costs of the defendants acting in the administration of an estate. . .

(This list may be incomplete)
This case is cited by:

(This list may be incomplete)

Last Update: 07 April 2019
Ref: 195098

The post Perotti v Watson and others: CA 26 Feb 2004 appeared first on swarb.co.uk.


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 4865

Trending Articles