The testator left a bequest in trust for such ‘benevolent purposes’ as the trustees might unanimously agree upon.
Held: The word ‘benevolent’ when coupled with another was not sufficient to restrict the trusts to charitable purposes and it failed.
References: [1817] EWHC Ch J10
Links: Bailii
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Last Update: 27 October 2020; Ref: scu.241581 br>
The post James and Another v Allen and others: ChD 30 Jun 1817 appeared first on swarb.co.uk.