Quantcast
Channel: Wills and Probate Archives - swarb.co.uk
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 4865

In Re White (Dennis) Deceased; White v Minnis and Another: CA 25 May 2000

$
0
0

A family partnership had carried freehold property at its historic cost value in the books, rather than at a market value. After the death of one partner the share came to be valued.
Held: Being a family partnership there was presumption that shares would be bought and sold at market value. The deceased partner could have been obliged to sign the accounts, in accordance with partnership practice, using that value, and so the historic cost was to be used not the market value.
Chadwick LJ
Gazette 25-May-2000, Times 10-May-2000, [2000] EWCA Civ 149
Bailii
Partnership Act 1890 27 32 33 39
England and Wales
Citing:
CitedNoble v Noble OHCS 1965
A father took his son into a farming partnership. The agreement recited that they agreed that ‘the heritable property should be taken as of the value of eight thousand pounds, but which is burdened with a heritable security for three thousand five . .
[1965] SLT 415
Appeal fromWhite v Minnis and Another ChD 18-Jan-1999
On the dissolution of a partnership, the valuation of assets was to be in accordance with the partnership deed but in the absence of explicit guidance property was to be valued at the date of dissolution and not at an historic value used in . .
Times 18-Jan-99, Gazette 27-Jan-99, [1999] 1 WLR 2079
CitedCoventry v Barclay 1863
Partners had conducted their practice over many years in a manner inconsistent with the spirit if not the exact letter of their partnership articles. Stock was to be taken every year, and the value entered into the books to be signed off by each . .
(1863) 3 De G J and Sm 320, (1863) 3 New Rep 224, (1863) 9 LT 496
CitedPilling v Pilling 1865
. .
(1865) 3 De G J and Sm 162
CitedHunter v Dowling CA 1893
The articles of partnership between the parties required an annual account. A retiring or deceased partner was to be paid out ‘at the amount standing to his credit in the last balance sheet which shall have been signed previously to the date of such . .
[1893] 3 Ch 212
CitedThom’s Executrix v Russel and Aitken 1983
The court was asked as to how the value of the interest of a deceased partner was to be calculated.
Held: There had been prior dealings at book value as between the partners, and the payment of the deceased partner’s share was restricted to . .
1983 SLT 335
CitedCruikshank v Sutherland HL 1923
The executors of a deceased partner of the respondents sought relief. The assets had been taken over from an earlier partnership between the parties and had been brought into the accounts of the new partnership at the values at which they had stood . .
(1923) 92 LJ(Ch) 136
CitedNoble v Noble OHCS 1965
A father took his son into a farming partnership. The agreement recited that they agreed that ‘the heritable property should be taken as of the value of eight thousand pounds, but which is burdened with a heritable security for three thousand five . .
[1965] SLT 415
CitedShaw v Shaw OHCS 1968
‘The authorities to which I was referred, including, in particular, Noble v Noble; Inner House, 28th January 1966 (unreported), and Cruickshank’s Trustees v Sutherland, satisfy me that, as a general principle, where in a partnership it is necessary . .
1968 SLT 94
CitedClark v Watson 1982
Two dentists practised in partnership. The co-partner said that on the death of one, to his estate should be paid ‘the Capital standing to the credit of the deceased Partner in the Accounts of the Partnership’. The court was asked whether that . .
1982 SLT 450
UnpersuasiveWilson v Dunbar Bank plc OHCS 1988
An agreement to the insertion of book values in a balance sheet prepared during the continuance of the partnership did not bind the deceased partner if that balance sheet fell to be used for the purpose of the ascertainment his share in the . .
1988 SLT 93
CitedAttorney-General v Boden 1912
There was a partnership between a father and his two sons. The sons were obliged to devote their whole time to the practice, the father only so much time as he wished. On his death the sons were to pay out to his estate the value of the capital but . .
[1912] 1 KB 539

These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 18 December 2020; Ref: scu.82291 br>

The post In Re White (Dennis) Deceased; White v Minnis and Another: CA 25 May 2000 appeared first on swarb.co.uk.


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 4865

Trending Articles