References: [2017] EWHC 494 (Fam)
Links: Bailii
Coram: Sir James Munby P FD
Ratio: The claimant sought to have unsealed the will of the late Princess Margaret.
Held: The application was struck out: ‘The applicant has not articulated any intelligible basis for her claim. The facts alleged by the applicant neither assert nor identify in any intelligible way either any link with HRH Princess Margaret or any link with her will. The applicant has not identified the grounds or the source or sources of the various beliefs upon which she relies. In short, her application is hopelessly defective.’
This case cites:
- Cited – Brown v HM Queen Elizabeth, the Queen Mother, the Executors of the Estate of and others FD (Bailii, [2007] EWHC 1607 (Fam), [2007] WTLR 1129)
The plaintiff sought the unsealing of the wills of the late Queen Mother and of the late Princess Margaret, claiming that these would assist him establishing that he was the illegitimate son of the latter.
Held: The application was frivolous. . . - Cited – Brown v Executors of the Estate of HM Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother and others CA (Bailii, [2008] EWCA Civ 56, [2008] 1 WLR 2327, [2008] 1 WLR 2327)
The claimant sought leave to appeal refusal of access to the will of Princess Margaret. He wished to prove that he was her illegitimate son. The will had been subject to an order providing that its contens were not to be published.
Held: . .
(This list may be incomplete)
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Last Update: 21-Mar-17
Ref: 580988
The post Re Benmusa: FD 14 Mar 2017 appeared first on swarb.co.uk.
