References: [2012] WTLR 121
Coram: Lush J
Ratio:Lush J doubted that a proper consideration when setting the terms for a statutory will under the 2005 Act, would be the desirability of the deceased being remembered for having ‘done the right thing’ in his will.
Statutes: Mental Capacity Act 2005
This case is cited by:
- Cited – NT -v- FS and Others CoP (Bailii, [2013] EWHC 684 (COP))
An application was made for a statutory will for the patient. The court considered how it should approach competing suggestions as to the provisions to be included.
Held: The 2005 Act had changed the basis for such wills fundamentally. The . .
(This list may be incomplete)
Last Update: 14-Jun-16
Ref: 510003
